Kulcsszavak
Hogyan kell idézni
Absztrakt
Aim: This study presents a new methodology developed within the framework of the medium-term National Anti-Corruption Strategy (2024–2025) for assessing corruption exposure at the level of government positions and job categories (hereafter: position-based assessment). The paper introduces an analytical model designed to quantify corruption exposure in a structured and comparable way.
Methodology: The methodology was developed within the KAR-MAP software system (Corruption Risk Identification System – Monitoring, Analytics, Prevention) to measure corruption exposure across public service positions. The objective was to establish an evidence-based approach capable of identifying the presence, magnitude, and accumulation of corruption exposure factors (KT1–KT20), as well as the effects of responsibility dimensions and the ranking of positions by exposure level. To ensure comparability, these elements are integrated into a single composite indicator the KKF (from the Hungarian Korrupciós Kitettségi Főszám, i.e., Corruption Exposure Composite Score). The KKF aggregates the distribution and intensity of exposure factors into a normalized, comparable metric without disclosing the protected aggregation logic, providing a structured, quantitative representation of corruption exposure.
Findings: The methodology aligns with the corruption-prevention frameworks of the OECD and UNODC and supports both organizational-level and position-level analysis. By linking micro-level job-specific exposure patterns with macro-level integrity frameworks, it offers a new analytical layer for international integrity assessment practices. Pilot applications confirmed that identifying exposure hotspots supports targeted integrity-development interventions and strengthens internal control mechanisms.
Value: The methodology and its associated digital analytical environment together constitute a robust and scalable tool that is capable not only of identifying corruption risks, but also of creating a tangible, operational deterrent through their continuous monitoring. The measurement process makes transparent where corruption risks are concentrated within the organization, thereby strengthening organizational integrity and fostering a conscious culture of corruption prevention.
Hivatkozások
Báger, G. (2011). Corruption risks in public administration – Methodology and empirical experiences. Public Finance Quarterly (Pénzügyi Szemle), 56(1), 44–57.
European Commission. (2023). 2023 Rule of Law Report: Country Chapter on Hungary. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fazekas, M., Tóth, I. J., & King, L. P. (2016). An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9308-z
Hajdu, M. (2023). Corruption risks of Hungarian municipalities: Quantitative and qualitative analyses (PhD thesis). Corvinus University of Budapest. https://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/1283/1/hajdu_miklos_den.pdf
Klotz P. (2021). Elemzési és értékelési módszertan a 2020–2022 közötti időszakra szóló középtávú Nemzeti Korrupcióellenes Stratégia, valamint az ahhoz kapcsolódó intézkedési terv elfogadásáról szóló 1328/2020. (VI. 19.) Korm. határozat 7. a) pontjához – a KÖFOP-2.2.3-VEKOP-16-2016-00001 azonosítószámú projekt keretében. [Methodology for Analysis and Evaluation in Relation to Point 7(a) of Government Resolution 1328/2020 (VI. 19.) on the Adoption of the Medium-Term National Anti-Corruption Strategy for the Period 2020–2022 and the Related Action Plan – within the Framework of Project KÖFOP-2.2.3-VEKOP-16-2016-00001.]
Münnich, Á., Hidegkuti, I., & Malét-Szabó, E. (2022). A személyi és szervezeti integritás kapcsolata: A szilárd erkölcsiség mérésére megalkotott elméleti SZEM-modell egy lehetséges továbbfejlesztése – előtanulmány (összefoglaló). [The Relationship between Individual and Organisational Integrity: A Possible Further Development of the Theoretical SZEM Model Developed for Measuring Solid Moral Character – Preliminary Study (Summary).] Belügyi Tudományos Tanács. https://bm-tt.hu/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/szem_tankotet.pdf
Németh, E., Vargha, B. T., & Pályi, K. Á. (2019). The scientific reliability of international corruption rankings. Public Finance Quarterly, 64(3), 319–336.
OECD. (2005). Public sector integrity: A framework for assessment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010604-en
OECD. (2016). Preventing corruption in public procurement. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264262935-en
OECD. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279961-en
OECD. (2018). Integrity for development: Towards a new framework for fighting corruption (OECD Anti-Bribery & Integrity Papers). OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). OECD Public Integrity Handbook. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ac8ed8e8-en
Surányiné Temesi M. & Kocsis L. (2025). Mesterséges intelligenciával támogatott innovatív korrupcióazonosító rendszer alapvetései a közigazgatásban. [Foundations of an Artificial Intelligence-Supported Innovative Corruption Identification System in Public Administration.] Belügyi Szemle, 73(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.38146/bsz-ajia.2025.v73.i2.pp235-252
Szilágyiné Fülöp, E. (2023). Abuses in public administration and their perception. Theory, Methodology, Practice: Review of Business and Management, 19(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2023.02.07
Temesi M., & Kocsis L. (2026). Digitális fordulat a korrupciómegelőzésben: Kockázatelemző rendszer fejlesztése és alkalmazási perspektívái. [A Digital Future for Corruption Prevention: Developing a Risk Analysis System and Its Application Prospects]. Belügyi Szemle.
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Transparency International.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2019). Preventing corruption in public administration: Integrity risk assessments and management. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). State of integrity: A guide on conducting corruption risk assessments in public organizations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/Publications/2020/State_of_Integrity_EN.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2021). Enhancing the use of data in anti-corruption efforts: Practical guide. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
UNODC. (2023). Corruption risk management: A guide for practitioners. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/Publications/2023/CRM_Guide_EN.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Belügyi Szemle