Keywords
death penalty
opposing views
new perspectives
opposing views
new perspectives
How to Cite
Zoltán J. Tóth: Death penalty pros and cons. (2015). Academic Journal of Internal Affairs, 63(6), 112-115. https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2015.6.9
Abstract
The volume is primarily recommended for those who wish to learn about opposing views that determine the debate over certain aspects of the death penalty and are open to embracing and considering new perspectives.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Similar Articles
- Horolma Pamzsav, An additional result of population genetics: genetical origin-of-life research , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 67 No. 11 (2019)
- Kitti Mezei, The challenges and legislative novelties related to electronic evidence , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 67 No. 10 (2019)
- Valér Dános, The experiences of 2020, the first year of the new ombudsman , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 68 No. 12 (2020)
- Szabolcs Mátyás, János Sallai, Tibor Szarvák, Miklós Tihanyi, Vince Vári, Towards a new paradigm: trust and security , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 67 No. 2 (2019)
- Péter Polt, The expected consequences of the criminal procedure legislation , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 9 (2018)
- István Herédi, Open source data collection on the Internet , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 7-8 (2018)
- Péter Nyeste, A new model for covert information collection, operations and intelligence , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 5 (2018)
- Anna Kiss, Changing of the roles in the new Criminal Procedure Act , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 5 (2018)
- Péter Hack, Prospects for reforming criminal procedure , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 3 (2018)
- Mihály Tóth, Notes on the new criminal procedure act , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 3 (2018)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.