Abstract
Aim: As practical law enforcement professionals, we guide readers into the world of private military companies, which is little known or completely unknown to many and shrouded in mystery and fiction, and raise some exciting questions that could serve as a starting point for further research.
Methodology: In our study, we examine the place and role of private military companies in today's military industry through a comparative analysis of online content, in addition to English and Hungarian sources, exploring a particularly interesting and topical issue through a new and extremely exciting lens, while also highlighting some particularly sensitive issues.
Findings: The study concludes that the role of private military companies in future conflicts will continue to grow and that they will become increasingly important in combat, training, personal protection, and peacekeeping tasks. It also points out that the legal regulation of their operations remains inadequate, which raises serious international legal challenges.
Value: Wars, changes in certain forms of warfare, the outsourcing of military activities to the civilian sector and their provision as services have fundamentally changed the way armed conflicts and acts of war are conducted and have created a rationale for the existence of private military companies. This study provides assistance in examining these activities.
References
Bothe, M., Partsch, K. J. & Solf, W. A. (1982). Új szabályok a fegyveres konfliktusok áldozatai számára: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Christián L. (Szerk.) (2014). A magánbiztonság elméleti alapjai. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Rendészettudományi Kar.
Gabidullin, M. (2022). Orosz zsoldosok Putyin szolgálatában. Corvina kiadó.
Hódosi Z., & Nóti-Nagy, A. (2015). A zsoldos, Egy magyar Irak poklában. Konkrét Könyvek.
Kinsey, C. (Ed.) (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security The Rise of Private Military Companies. Taylor & Francis e-Library. VIII., 135-136. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018354
Lévai Cs. (2020). Szempontok az amerikai (1776) és a magyar (1849) függetlenségi nyilatkozat összehasonlításához. Századok, 154(3), 475-494.
Loader, I. & Percy, S. (2012). Bringing the „outside” in and the „inside” out: Crossing the criminology IR divide. Global Crime 13(4), 213-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2012.715402
Schumacher, G. (2006). A bloody business: America’s war zone contractors and the occupation of Iraq.
Sheptycki, J. (2007). The constabulary ethic and the transnational condition. In Goldsmith, A., & Sheptycki, J. (Eds.), Crafting Transnational Policing: Police Capacity-Building and Global Policing Reform. Hart Publishing, 31-73. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472564108
Singer, P. W. (2003). Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Militarized Private Security Industry. Cornell University Press.
Smith, D. B. (2022). Private Military Companies: The Future Armies.
Varga K. (2009). Civilek a harcmezőn-katonai magánvállalatok. Magyar Külügyi Intézet.
Xenophón (1968). Anabaszisz. Európa kiadó.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Internal Affairs