Abstract
Aim: The aim of the review is to present diversion models operating outside the criminal justice system in the United States as alternative approaches to mass incarceration and criminalisation, and to examine in detail their associated advantages and limitations.
Methodology: The author of the reviewed work analyses diversion models on the basis of secondary sources and scholarly literature on court-based diversion methods, in particular drug courts, as well as through primary research and analysis of the so-called LEAD model implemented in Seattle and other cities. In addition, observations and individual and focus group interviews were conducted.
Findings: The analysis indicates that the models examined are not, in themselves, capable of providing a comprehensive solution to the issues identified; however, they draw attention to the complex institutional and social problems underlying the phenomenon.
Value: Among the various diversion models, the article highlights their respective strengths and their significance.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Internal Affairs
