Keywords
criminal procedure
evidence theory
expert opinions
evidence theory
expert opinions
How to Cite
On the theory and practice of expert opinions in criminal procedure. (2018). Academic Journal of Internal Affairs, 66(9), 58-81. https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2018.9.4
Abstract
The author provides an overview of the evidence theory and jurisprudence concerning expert opinion in Hungary.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Similar Articles
- András Czebe, Fuzzy logic behind forensic identity , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 68 No. 2. ksz. (2020): Special Issue
- Alíz Ambrusz, Zita Marosi, The relationship between alcohol and a violent crime in a pub , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 68 No. 7 (2020)
- Johanna Farkas, Forensic child psychology , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 68 No. 5 (2020)
- Péter Dulai, Fire blazed up by violence in media – a serial killing with sexual emotion from the perspective of criminal psychology , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 68 No. 2 (2020)
- István Zsolt Máté, Investigating attacks on IT-systems: the role of digital evidence , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 7-8 (2018)
- Tibor Gaál, The increasing role of digital evidence in criminal procedure , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 7-8 (2018)
- László Fázsi, Dilemmas for use of records made under rights violation in criminal judgement , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 4 (2018)
- Dávid Petrétei, About knowledge theoretical access of evidences , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 66 No. 4 (2018)
- Erika Sándor, The role of diatom in the medical investigation of drowning and stillborns , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 64 No. 7-8 (2016)
- Gergely Gárdonyi, The achievements and developments in Hungarian crime scene investigation , Academic Journal of Internal Affairs: Vol. 64 No. 7-8 (2016)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.