Kulcsszavak
federal state structure
Declaration of Independence
Supreme Court
Hogyan kell idézni
Absztrakt
Aim: The aim of this study is to review the specific features of the Constitution of the United States of America, in view of the historical circumstances of its creation, and its topicality. The author stresses that the US Constitution and its interpretation have changed in the light of changing economic, political and social circumstances.
Methodology: The author of the study has used the historical and comparative method in writing the paper. It has been considered how and to what extent this constitution has been and is being taken into account today outside the United States, particularly in European countries.
Findings: The authors, the ‘Founding Fathers’ of the Constitution of the United States of America agreed that the Constitution should provide the legal basis i.e. the garantee of the separation and balance of powers. The principle of separation of powers implies the creation of three separate institutions of equal importance in the exercise of power. The checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution ensure balanced exercise of power. In addition to widespread presidential power, the preeminent role of the Supreme Court is according to ou view the most distinctive feature of the constitutional system of the United States of America.
Value: In Hungary, this study provides a complex introduction to the Constitution of the United States of America. This includes the sources of the Constitution, the original text of the Constitution and its Amendments.
Hivatkozások
Adams, J. (1775). Novanglus or a History of the Dispute with America from its Origin, in 1754, to the Present Time. In Butterfield, L. H. (Ed.), Diary and Autobiography of John Adams. Volume 3. (pp. 313–314). Harvard University Press.
Adams, J. (1776). Thoughts on Government. In Taylor, R. J. (Ed.), Papers of John Adams. Volume 4. (pp. 86–93). Harvard University Press.
Adams, J. (1787–1788). A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the USA. In Lint, G. L., Martin, S., Taylor, C. J., Georgini, S., Woodward, H., Sikes, S. B. & Norton, A. M. (Eds.), Papers of John Adams. Volume 18. (pp. 544–550). Harvard University Press.
Beck, J. M. (1924). The Constitution of the United States: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. G. H. Doran.
Belz, H. (1971). The Realist Critique of Constitutionalism in the Era of Reform. American Journal of Legal History, 15, 288–306.
Brennan, W. J. (1992). The Ninth Amendment and Fundamental Rights. In O’Reilly, J. (Ed.), Human Rights and Constitutional Law: Essays in Honour of Brian Walsh (pp. 109). Round Hall Press.
Choper, J. H. (1980). Judicial Review and the National Political Pro-cess: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court. The University of Chicago Press.
Corwin, E. S. (1914). Marbury vs. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review, 12(7), 538–572.
Corwin, E. S. (1916). French Policy and the American Alliance of 1778. Princeton University Press.
Corwin, E. S. (1917). The President’s Control of Foreign Relations. Princeton University Press.
Corwin, E. S. (1928). The „Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review, 42(2), 149–185.
Corwin, E. S. (1928). The „Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law II. Harvard Law Review, 42(3), 365–409.
Corwin, E. S. (1948). Our Constitutional Revolution and How to Round it Out. Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, 19, 261–284.
Corwin, E. S. (1950). The Natural Law and Constitutional Law. In Ca-vanaugh, J. J., Pope Pius XII., Barrett, E. F., O’Sullivan, R., Corwin, E. S., Kuttner, S. & Romulo, C. P., Natural Law Institute Preceedings Volume III (pp. 47–81). Proceedings of the Natural Law Institute. University of Notre Dame.
Corwin, E. S. (1976). Presidential Power and the Constitution: Essays by Edward S. Corwin. In Loss, R. (Ed. with an Introduction), Presiden-tial Power and the Constitution: Essays by Edward S. Corwin. Cor-nell University Press
Dowd, M. D. (1965). Justice Joseph Story and the Politics of Appoint-ment. The American Journal of Legal History, 9(4), 265–285.
Fordham, J. B. (1970). The Legal Profession and American Constitutio-nalism. Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
Földi A. & Hamza G. (2023). A római jog története és institúciói (27. átdolgozott és bővített kiadás). Novissima Kiadó.
Friedman, L. M. (1988). State Constitutions in Historical Perspective. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Scien-ce, 496(1), 33–42.
Gillman, H. (1993). The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Duke University Press Books.
Grimm, D. (1970). Europäisches Naturrecht und Amerikanische Revolution: Die Verwandlung politischer Philosophie in politische Techne. Vittorio Klostermann.
Hamilton, A. (1774). A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress. In Syrett, H. C. (Ed.), The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. Volume 1 (pp. 45–78). Columbia University Press.
Hamilton, A. (1775). The Farmer Refuted. In Syrett, H. C. (Ed.), The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. Volume 1 (pp. 81–165). Columbia University Press.
Hamza, G. (2009). Entstehung und Entwicklung der modernen Pri-vatrechtsordnungen und die römischrechtliche Tradition. Eötvös Ki-adó.
Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Hölzle, E. (1931). Naturrecht, Staatsrecht und Historisches Recht im Zeitalter der englischen und amerikanischen Revolution. Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 24(4), 452–465.
Hunt, G. (Ed.) (1900). The Writings of James Madison, comprising his Public Papers and his Private Correspondence, including his numerous letters and documents now for the first time printed. Volume 9. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Jellinek, G. (1922). Allgemeine Staatslehre. 4. durchg., Aufl. Neudruck der Ausgabe vom 1914. Springer.
Herlitz, N. (1969). Elements of Nordic Public Law. The Institute for Legal Research, 54, 287.
Koopmans, T. (1988). The Roots of Judicial Activism. In Matscher, F. & Petzold, H. (Eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Di-mension. Studies in Honour of Gérard J. Wiarda (pp. 317–327). Carl Heymanns Verlag.
Loss, R. (Ed.) (1976). Presidential Power and the Constitution: Essays by Edward S. Corwin. Cornell University Press.
Morton White, P. (1978). The Philosophy of the American Revolution. Oxford University Press.
Plucknett, Th. F. T. (1926). Bonham’s Case and Judicial Review. Har-vard Law Review, 40(30), 70.
Schurman, J. G. (1908). Addresses and Papers of Charles Evans Hughes Governos of New York 1906–1908. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Scott, W. B. (1977). In Pursuit of Happiness: American Conceptions of Property from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century. Indiana University Press.
Semonche, J. E. (1978). Charting the Future: The Supreme Court Res-ponds to a Changing Society, 1890–1920. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Smith, F. A. (1952). Judicial Review of Legislation in New York: 1906–1938. Columbia University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (1995). An Eighteenth Century Presidency in a Twenty-First Century World. Arkansas Law Review, (48)1, 1.
Thorne, S. E. (1985). Dr. Bonham’s Case. In Thorne, S. E., Essays in English Legal History (pp. 269–278). The Hambledon Press.
Thorne, S. E. (1985): Sir Edward Coke, 1552–1952. In Thorne, S. E., Essays in English Legal History (pp. 223–238). The Hambledon Press.
Warren, C. (1935). Congress, the Constitution and the Supreme Court. Little, Brown and Company.
Wilson, J. (2007). Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Leg-islative Authority of the British Parliament. In Hall, K. L. & Hall, M. D. (Eds.), Collected Works of James Wilson. Volume 1. Liberty Fund.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Belügyi Szemle