Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: This paper examines the fundamental constitutional and legislative rules regarding the state’s involvement and the state’s ownership in the Hungarian economy. It aims to establish what model follows from the relevant rules regarding the place and the role of state-owned enterprises in the national economy, in particular whether they are subjected to the multiple and complex considerations that became to characterise the state-owned enterprise sector in Europe after the global financial and economic crisis. Previous political economy research has established that state-owned enterprises are now driven in many national jurisdictions by factors beyond their public mission and public interest tasks, which include in particular objectives of strategic nature. Research of the political economy of Hungarian capitalism has highlighted similar developments in Hungary. We aimed to examine whether the applicable legal framework confirms the findings of political economy research.
Methodology: Our research was doctrinal legal research combined with evidence collected regarding developments in the Hungarian market for state-owned enterprises. It was framed by providing an overview of the state of the art in the political economy research on state-owned enterprises in European economies before and after the global financial and economic crisis, and in the political economy research on the Hungarian market economy and state-owned enterprises therein before and after the political landmark year of 2010.
Findings: Our research has found that although the fundamental constitutional and legislative provisions governing the state’s involvement and the state’s ownership in the Hungarian economy establish only a rough framework, the law indeed reflects the model preferred for the national economy and state-owned enterprises therein, and gives expression of a model change. However, since the law may only provide the fundamentals of the preferred economic model, leaving the choice and the development of details to politics and policy-making, our assessment had to be supported with evidence of actual nationalisations and re-nationalisation in the Hungarian economy. Nevertheless, our analysis of the applicable legal rules has revealed that the Hungarian SOE landscape in influenced by complex, often strategic interests and other factors, beyond their traditional public interest roles.
Value: By examining the legal rules governing the state’s involvement and the state’s ownership in the Hungarian economy, our research provides an important contribution to the already existing political economy scholarship on state-owned enterprises, as well as on changes in Hungarian economic policy. The applicable legal rules provided our main evidence, which were supplemented with evidence of market developments, which combination of evidence in the research on state-owned enterprises in Hungary holds considerable added-value.
References
Bance, P. (2015). Public enterprises and production of global public goods: The effectiveness of internalizing public missions in relation to climate issues. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(4), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12100
Bernier, L. (2014). Public enterprises as policy instruments: The importance of public entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2014.909312
Bernier, L., & Reeves, E. (2018). The continuing importance of state-owned enterprise in the twenty-first century: Challenges for public policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89(3), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12213
Bremmer, I. (2009). State capitalism comes of age: The end of the free market? Foreign Affairs, 88(3), 40–55.
Bremmer, I. (2010). Article commentary: The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations? European View, 9(2), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-010-0129-z
Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907401
Castelnovo, P., Del Bo, C. F., & Florio, M. (2019). Quality of institutions and productivity of state-invested enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies. European Journal of Political Economy, 58, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.10.005
Clò, S. (2020). Varieties of state capitalism and reformed state-owned enterprises in the new millennium. In P. Bance, M. Florio, & B. Šak (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises (pp. 91–105). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351042543-5
Clò, S., Del Bo, C. F., Ferraris, M., Florio, M., Vandone, D., & Fiorio, C. (2015). Public enterprises in the market for corporate control: Recent worldwide evidence. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(4), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12093
Clò, S., Ferraris, M., & Florio, M. (2017a). Ownership and environmental regulation: Evidence from the European electricity industry. Energy Economics, 61, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.001
Clò, S., Fiorio, C. V., & Florio, M. (2017b). The targets of state capitalism: Evidence from M&A deals. European Journal of Political Economy, 47, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.12.005
Del Bo, C. F., & Florio, M. (2012). Public enterprises, planning and policy adoption: Three welfare propositions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 15(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2012.722846
Del Bo, C. F., Ferraris, M., & Florio, M. (2017). Governments in the market for corporate control: Evidence from M&A deals involving state-owned enterprises. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.11.006
Drinóczi, T. (2012). Gazdasági alkotmány az Alaptörvényben. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 67(10), 369–383.
Farkas, B. (2018). What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations. International Journal of Management and Economics, 54(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0027
Florio, M. (2013). Rethinking on public enterprise: Editorial introduction and some personal remarks on the research agenda. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2013.785664
Florio, M. (2014). Contemporary public enterprises: innovation, accountability, governance. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2014.913823
Florio, M., Ferraris, M., & Vandone, D. (2018). Motives of mergers and acquisitions by state-owned enterprises: A taxonomy and international evidence. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(2), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2017-0050
Gerőcs, T. (2021). Magyarország függő fejlődése. Napvilág.
Gjersem, C., Hemmings, P., & Reindl, A. (2004). Product market competition and economic performance in Hungary. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 381. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/222142524253
Hall, D., Lobina, E., & Terhorst, P. (2013). Re-municipalisation in the early twenty-first century: Water in France and energy in Germany. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.754844
Haney, A. B., & Pollitt, M. G. (2013). New models of public ownership in energy. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.734790
Heal, G. M. (1973). The theory of economic planning. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Zhang, C. M. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0543
Lampropoulou, M. (2020). Utilities policy and reform: The changing relationship between citizens and state-owned enterprises. In P. Bance, M. Florio, & B. Šk. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises (pp. 479–498). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351042543-27
Mühlenkamp, H. (2015). From state to market revisited: A reassessment of the empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(4), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12092
Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098
Nölke, A., & May, C. (2019). Liberal versus organised capitalism: A historical-comparative perspective. In Gerőcs, T., & Szanyi, M. (Eds.), Market liberalism and economic patriotism in the capitalist world-system (pp. 21–42). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05186-0_3
O’Donnell, K., & Sawyer, M. C. (1999). A future of public ownership. Lawrence & Wishart.
OECD. (2004). OECD Economic Surveys: Hungary 2004. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-hun-2004-en
OECD. (2014). OECD Economic Surveys: Hungary 2014. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-hun-2014-en
Polidori, P., & Teobaldelli, D. (2013). Prosocial behavior in the production of publicly provided goods and services: An overview. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.736481
Sappideen, R. (2017). Corporate governance with Chinese characteristics: The case of state-owned enterprises. Frontiers of Law in China, 12(1), 90–113. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2964606
Schmidt, V. (2003). French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society, 32(4), 526–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514032000141693
Sorrentino, M. (2020). State-owned enterprises and the public mission. In Bance, P., Florio, M., & Šk, B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises (pp. 73–90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351042543-4
Szanyi, M. (2019a). Some aspects of state ownership in East-Central European transition. In Szanyi, M. (Ed.), Seeking the best master: State ownership in the varieties of capitalism (pp. 137–161). CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633863220-006
Szanyi, M. (2019b). The revival of the state. In Szanyi, M. (Ed.), Seeking the best master: State ownership in the varieties of capitalism (pp. 1–12). CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789633863220-001
Szanyi, M. (2019c). The emergence of the patronage state in Central Europe: The case of FDI-related policies in Hungary since 2010. In Gerőcs, T., & Szanyi, M. (Eds.), Market liberalism and economic patriotism in the capitalist world-system (pp. 99–126). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05186-0_6
Tang, P., Yang, S., & Yang, S. (2020). How to design corporate governance structures to enhance corporate social responsibility in China's mining state-owned enterprises? Resources Policy, 66, 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101619
Voszka, É. (2013). Államosítás, privatizáció, államosítás. Közgazdasági Szemle, 60(12), 1289–1317.
Voszka, É. (2015). Államosítás, privatizáció és gazdaságpolitika – a főirány széttöredezése. Közgazdasági Szemle, 62(7–8), 717–748.
Voszka, É. (2018). Nationalisation in Hungary in the post-crisis years: A specific twist on a European trend? Europe-Asia Studies, 70(8), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1457137
Voszka, É. (2020). Állami vagy magántulajdon? Adalékok egy dichotómia értelmezéséhez. Közgazdasági Szemle, 67(12), 1193–1216. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2020.12.1193
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Internal Affairs